Objects Location

Where it Stands: Actual vs Symbolic Spaces

In order to be processed, objects must be “at hand”, i.e activities must know where to find them and then fetch them. That will be straightforward for local objects but may entail architectural constraints when targeted objects cannot be fetched directly (if at all), and therefore instantly.

Obj (B. Aharonovitch)

Objects must be “at hand” (B. Aharonovitch)

Location and Architectural Constraints

System Modelling is meant to encompass both actual contexts and symbolic representations under a single roof, and legacy and new applications along a single time scale.

The first rationale behind object locations is that if an activity has to be performed as a whole, it must have complete control over its resources, which means instant and secure access to targeted objects given the activity location.

On location everything is at hand

A dual rationale is to enforce the integrity of objects targeted by simultaneous activities: contrary to a single location, multiple ones will bear specific architectural constraints: authorization, confidentiality, synchronization, etc.

Hence, as far as system architectures are concerned, two aspects must be clarified as soon as possible:

  • The actual location of objects and the agents using them.
  • The relative location of symbolic representations with cross dependencies. Their actual location will be set depending on system architecture.

Distributed updates must be synchronized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: